Posted on by Judy

1. In your reading, What’s the Difference Between Public and Private Sector Unions, the author indicates that collective bargaining in the government sector may be anti democratic as it engages primarily political rather than economic power; often results in no impact to the employer (government) as costs of increased contract demands are passed on to the taxpayer or national/state debt levels; and that strikes are not an economic weapon against the employer, but hurt the poorest in our society. Make a brief argument in support of or against the premise of this article. Defend your position. Use a reference in addition to this article. 2. Locate and briefly summarize a case decision where an employer or union was found guilty of bad faith bargaining ( or not!). Briefly summarize the decision and explain whether you agree or disagree with the outcome. Make sure to post the URL and the full APA reference.

Yes I agree that collective bargaining in the public sector is anti democratic. It is no different than private sector and there are policy reasons for the authorization of private sector unions. There is unequal bargaining power and there are negotiations between employers and individual workers. This results in working conditions and there are rise in compensation usually below the public policy standards.
There can be focus put on its improvement and this can be passing the legislation for the law and meeting the desired standards or passing legislation which allows workers in the industries for bargain collectively.
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"

Related posts:

  1. subject- training and development topic – debate statement- Briefly describe how training and development benefits organizations, employees and society. -gather additional sources in support of your position. take the side that you most agree on of the debate statement. -the answer should be more than one paragraph. the answer should be related to training and development.
  2. Agricultural-Biological-Technology is the future, and a company developing a new “gene” that would make food more nutritious would have a valuable asset if no other company could use their discovery. Make an argument as to why businesses that develop modified organisms should be able to preserve their property rights by patenting such organisms. Your argument might include the purpose of a patent being designed to protect the payoffs from investments in this sort of research and development. Then, make a counterargument as to why such organisms should not be allowed a patent. While you should present both sides, you should clearly choose a position for or against and attempt to persuade the reader to adopt your position. Arguments against might be found on websites like http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en and http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org. Also, be sure to read the United States Supreme Court decision of Diamond v. Chakrabarty. Submit a written paper which 3-4 pages in length exclusive of reference page. Paper should be double-spaced and should cite reliable sources to support your ideas. Be sure to read the assessment criteria below before you begin writing.
  3. Agricultural-Biological-Technology is the future, and a company developing a new “gene” that would make food more nutritious would have a valuable asset if no other company could use their discovery. Make an argument as to why businesses that develop modified organisms should be able to preserve their property rights by patenting such organisms. Your argument might include the purpose of a patent being designed to protect the payoffs from investments in this sort of research and development. Then, make a counterargument as to why such organisms should not be allowed a patent. While you should present both sides, you should clearly choose a position for or against and attempt to persuade the reader to adopt your position. Arguments against might be found on websites like http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en and http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org. Also, be sure to read the United States Supreme Court decision of Diamond v. Chakrabarty. Submit a written paper which 3-4 pages in length exclusive of reference page. Paper should be double-spaced and should cite reliable sources to support your ideas. Be sure to read the assessment criteria below before you begin writing.
  4. he structure and content of the case report should follow the guidance you have been given during your tort lectures and workshops. (For additional support, you might also want to refer to your ELS Workshop 7 resources and Chapter 7 of Finch & Fafinsky’s Legal Skills). Please note that your answer to the question should mostly be in your own words. Do not simply cut and paste large sections of the judgment and/or the article. The second part of your answer should be approx 100 words and you should identify the academic article you are commenting on. QUESTION Prepare a case report of Darnley v Croydon Health Service Trust [2018] UKSC 50. Review the following journal article which comments on the case. Briefly summarise the author’s argument and indicate whether you agree or disagree. Fulbrook, J, – J.P.I. Law 2019,1, C1 – C4 The report must include all of the attached in the image.