Posted on by Judy

Addresses Course Outcomes 4 Recognize Current And Emerging Technical Challenges

Addresses Course Outcomes 4:

recognize current and emerging technical challenges and areas of innovation inherent in the field of bioinformatics to target career opportunities and development

For Bioinformatics tools and emerging technologies assessment project you will

Select one tool used in gene or protein annotation. Write a paragraph describing the bioinformatics purpose the tool serves and how it works. Perform the following assessments:

Functionality of the tool
Current issues with the tool
Foreseen challenges
Suggestions for improvements

Select one emerging bioinformatics technology. Write a paragraph describing the bioinformatics/medical or scientific research problem that the tool is addressing, how it is used in bioinformatics. Perform an assessment on:

Capability of the technology to solve the bioinformatics/medical/scientific research it is addressing
The distinction between this technology and the already existing technology that relatives performs similar tasks.
Obvious and foreseen challenges for the technology
Suggest any other tasks the technology needs to complete and additional features that would help the technology accomplish its mission.

Conclusion on the bioinformatics and scientific research that the tool and technology are addressing, their success, challenges and shortcomings.
General requirements for the project are: The project should have at least 3 pages and not more than 8 pages. The tool must not be the same as the technology selected. They must be discussed separately in two subsections each with an introduction paragraph.
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"

Related posts:

  1. Social Media and depression
  2. Who was Etheridge Knight?
  3. haently Stthe ment son. perty son t can possession one more type cr n cover such items as inventory and equipment of a business depriving the owner of use elements are the same as for theft, with the addition of For embement: The person commits the crime while in the employ or position property owner. In other words, embezzlement is theft from a specific tustrson-an employer. Although it is usually limited to funds, embezzle- can sKozlowski and Mark Swartz, the fommer CEO and CFO, respectively, of Tyco Interna- Consider Dennis initially had a hung jury in their trial for larceny Mc Kozlowski and Mr. Swartz, who we ie eventuly convicted of embezzlement, enjoyed personal benefits from Tyco, an embarrassment of personal acquisition at company ow mens rea, criminal intent. The defense that both men raised to counter intent, and apparently successfully enough to flummox some jurors in their first tral company agreements and programs was done secretly. Both men produced evidence related to board knowledge of their perks and approvals through the established and proper company procedures for personal loans and the use of company funds for refurbishing and furnishing their homes. Along the lines of a “Why would I be such an idiot?” defense, the two approached their case as one in which the blatancy expense. Prosecutors must sh was that none of what they obtained through the various co of their conduct would work in their favor in mitigating intent, or mens rea. None of the loans was made to the men without some form of authorization, however perfunctory. Many in the executive ranks and perhaps even some board members were aware of the loans, the fficer loan policy, and the processes used for booking and forgiving the loans mnutes from February 21, 2002, show that the committee was given a list of loans to officers nd also approved all compensation packages. There was no public disclosure of these develop- The issue of board approval on the loans remains a question, but compensation committee Do you believe these facts supported the jury’s finding of mens rea in the retral of the cases gainst Mr. Kozlowski and Mr. Swartz? Was their conduct ethical? ments or the committee’s review. from Andrew Ross Sorkin, “Judge Ends Trial When Tyco uror Reports Threat” New Yok Times. Apni 3 200, Sorkin, “After a Mistrial, Choices to Make” New York Times, Apri 5, 2004 pp. CI. C6 jonathan D nthan D Cate Spending Was No Secret.” Wall treet jounal, February 9, 2004 pp. Al,A23. Andrew Ros Sorkin and P Al: Lauie P. Cohen.T AI, B4, Andrew Delense Strategy More Time in Another Tyco Case,” New York Times, Apil 8 2004, p. C4 Murk Maremont, “Kodowski’s Some Tyco Board Members Knew of Pay Packages, Records Show.” New York Times September 23, 2002 P. Cchen, yco E-Counsel Claims Auditors Knew of Loans,” Wal Street joumal October 22, 2002 p A6 https://media.cheggcdn.com/media%2F17e%2F17ea4b02-b59e-4ede-a970-6d96b8d674d5%2Fimage
  4. Week 3 19234755