Posted on by Judy

T v F ___15. Washington is a member state that follows SSUTA (“Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement”). ___16. An answer usually includes only a defendant’s responses to plaintiff’s complaint allegations (that is, only admissions or denials of the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint). ___17. The formal process called “discovery” involves the gathering of evidence concerning the case, before the complaint is filed. ___18. A motion for summary judgment can only be granted by a trial court when there are no genuine issues of material fact in a pending case, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ___19. A defendant who has been served with a Washington state court complaint has 30 days to serve an answer or other allowed response, to avoid being held in default by the court.

15. The answer is given below:
True
Washington is a member of SSUTA since 2008 as where the sellers need to collect tax on sales.
16. The answer is given below:
True
The defendant is a party from civil lawsuit and the defendant response to plaintiff’s complaint allegations.
17. The answer is given below:
True
The case should be filed on understanding the issues and the evidence needs to be gather to support and file and case which is called as discovery.
18. The answer is given below:
True
A motion for summary can be granted in the trail court as there is no material of facts or information need to be tried as it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
19. The answer is given below:
False
A defendant can take 60 days to provide the answer and response to avoid being held in default by the court
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"

Related posts:

  1. In the case Palsgraf v. The Long Island Railroad, 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99, 1928 N.Y.Lexis 1269 (N.Y.), Justice Cardoza denied recovery for the plaintiff. Justice Cardoza found that the railroad was not the proximate cause of Helen Palsgraf’s injuries. The concept of proximate cause is one that is less than precise. In today’s world of business can we still be sure that the reasoning used by Cardoza still applies? Has a new standard developed?
  2. 26. The complaint and answer documents are two examples of A. pleadings. B. hearsay. C. depositions and interrogatories. D. discovery. 27. Bonnie steals some very expensive cooking equipment from a restaurant supply store. Bonnie has committed the intentional tort of A. slander of title. B. conversion. C. petty theft. D. grand theft. 28. The elements of the tort of negligence include A. defendant’s breach of defendant’s duty B. plaintiff’s injury or damages C. a causal connection between defendant’s breach of duty and plaintiff’s injury or damages D. defendant’s breach of defendant’s duty, plaintiff’s injury or damages, and a causal connection between defendant’s breach of defendant’s duty and plaintiff’s injury or damages 29. Nancy owns a pet store in Seattle, and one of her dogs escapes and runs out onto the sidewalk in front of her store. If a passerby is bitten by Nancy’s dog, despite the passerby’s attempts to avoid and then run away from the dog, under the theory of strict liability, as applied in Washington, Nancy must pay for the injury A. only if Nancy intended to injure the passerby. B. only if Nancy knew that the dog had dangerous tendencies, and did not keep the dog restrained. C. regardless of whether Nancy was at fault in failing to restrain the dog. D. even if the passerby provoked the dog.
  3. Question: On what theory did the franchisees sue Carvel? Question: What must a plaintiff prove to win on this theory? Question: What does economic advantage mean? Question: How does this tort differ from tortious interference with contract? Question: What are the elements of tortious interference with contract? Question: In the Carvel case, what was the basis for the plaintiffs claim of economic advantage? What did Carvel do to upset the plaintiffs? Question: Did the court agree that this conduct amounted to tortious interference with prospective advantage? Why or why not?
  4. 39. A federal district court has the power to decide a contract dispute lawsuit if A. the amount in dispute exceeds $75,000. B. the plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states. C. the plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states, and the amount in dispute exceeds $75,000. D. the plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states, and the amount in dispute exceeds $50,000. 40. Which of the following is a method of alternative dispute resolution? A. Mediation B. Negotiated settlement C. Arbitration D. Mediation, Negotiated settlement, and Arbitration 41. Methods by which parties can gather evidence to prove their cases at trial include A. requests for admission B. hearsay C. requests for admission and interrogatories. D. interrogatories 42. Requests for production of documents can be directed to A. the judge in the case. B. witnesses who are not parties to the lawsuit. C. a plaintiff by a defendant, or a defendant by a plaintiff. D. none of the listed persons. 43. In the voir dire (jury selection) process, a prospective juror may not be challenged, due to A. the prospective juror’s bias B. the prospective juror’s race C. the prospective juror’s gender D. the prospective juror’s race or gender.