Week 4 Discussions

Absolutely no plagiarism, must be original and very thorough. Please make sure everything is followed in the question and the grading rubric. Assigned articles are attached, please also use at least one other outside academic resource for each question. Must include in-text citations. Must include specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. No cover page needed but the questions should be separate. Please provide short but thorough sentences. Supporting material: Attached The White House Office of the Press Secretary (11 May 2017). Presidential Executive Order on Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/05/11/presidential-executive-order-strengthening-cybersecurity-federal (Links to an external site.) https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/09/10/cyber-security-and-cyber-governance-federal-regulation-and-oversight-today-and-tomorrow/ Question #1: Provide an example of a recent data breach. Through your research, explain how the system was compromised and how it was resolved? What was the cost associated with the breach? Your example must not repeat one chosen by another student. Overall, do you think the public is comfortable with how businesses are protecting the confidential information of its customers? How can compliance and risk management professionals make a difference? Question #2: According to Maria Tzanou’s article, “Data protection has always been linked to privacy in such a way that it is very difficult to assess its very notion, its purpose, and its value without falling back to privacy.” The article discusses the shortcomings of data protection theories and argues data protection laws should be ‘reconstructed’ in order to operate as a fundamental right to privacy. Provide an argument against or for this position. Please see grading rubric below. This assignment should be at least 4-5 paragraphs each and very thorough. Make sure you integrate real-life applications to support key points. Case Discussion Rubric (2016) Case Discussion Rubric (2016) This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Initial Posting Initial response displays an excellent understanding of the assigned case, the course readings, and the underlying concepts and includes the correct use of relevant terminology. Initial response additionally integrates specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. Initial response is clear, concise, and compelling. This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics Entirely free of mechanical errors. These include: grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting (font style and size).
[ad_2]Source link
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"