Marking Guide Assessment task 2 – Literature review
Presentation 0 points 1 point 2 points 3 points 4 points 5 points
PRESENTATION Structure
Presentation displayed no clear structure and sequence. Did not follow the assessment guidelines.
Moderate structure and/or sequence of presentation. Poorly followed the assessment guidelines.
Presentation required a more clear structure/ sequence, and/or better linking dialogue between information.
Presentation displayed a clear structure and sequence – introduction, body, and conclusion, references Linking dialogue provided.
Presentation displayed a good structure and sequence –introduction, body, and conclusion, references Linking dialogue provided.
Presentation displayed excellent structure and sequence – introduction, body, and conclusion, references Linking dialogue provided.
PRESENTATION Fluency
Format of presentation was poor with no fluency between, themes or information.
Format required greater attention to ensure the presenter, themes or information flowed.
Format required more attention to ensure the presenter, themes or information flowed.
Format of presentation flowed at times, themes and information.
Format of presentation flowed most of the time, appropriate themes and mostly relevant information.
Format of presentation flowed at all times, with sound themes and relevant information.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Not present Present but not well defined
Present slightly explained
Present with some demonstration of thought when using a PICO approach
Present with good demonstration of thought when using a PICO approach
Present with excellent demonstration of thought when using a PICO approach
CONTENT Literature table
No understanding of the task demonstrated. No links or connections made between ideas. Information was irrelevant and poorly expressed.
Poor understanding of the task demonstrated. Links and connections between ideas unclear. A lot of information was irrelevant or poorly expressed.
Minimal understanding of the task demonstrated. Numerous links and connections between ideas unclear. Some information was irrelevant or not well expressed.
Moderate understanding of the topic demonstrated. Some links and connections between ideas unclear. Most information was relevant.
Substantial understanding of the task demonstrated. Links and connections between ideas generally clear. Information was relevant.
Excellent understanding of the task demonstrated. Links and connections between ideas made clear. Information was relevant and well expressed.
CONTENT Use of CASP tool
No evidence of the use of the CASP tool
CASP tool mentioned CASP tool mentioned and demonstrated
CASP tool used to critique papers and scores present in table
CASP tool critique is demonstrated well throughout table
CASP tool critique is demonstrated well and explained
CONTENT Literature flow chart
Flow chart was absent, did not follow the assessment guidelines for this task.
The flow chart was poorly constructed, with little evidence of a logical sequence.
The Flow chart showed some detail and logical sequence.
The Flow chart showed moderate detail and logical sequence.
The Flow chart showed good sound detail and logical sequence.
The Flow chart showed excellent detail and logical sequence.
CONTENT Discussion
Findings section was absent, did not follow the assessment guidelines for this task.
The findings section was poorly constructed, with little evidence of a logical sequence.
The findings section showed some detail and logical sequence.
The Findings section showed moderate detail and logical sequence.
The Findings section showed good sound detail and logical sequence.
The Findings section showed excellent detail and logical sequence.
CONTENT Critique
No critique of the literature
Literature is poorly critiqued
Some attempt at critique of the literature was made
The literature has been critiqued with some attempt at linking the papers together
The literature has been critiqued well with some attempt at papers linked together
An excellent literature critique with an link between papers demonstrated
STRUCTURE Professional Prose
Inconsistent levels of articulation or expression, numerous spelling and grammatical errors and lack of sentence/paragraph structure makes paper difficult to read/understand.
Poor level of articulation and expression, with sentence or paragraph structure unclear, and/or extensive spelling or grammatical errors.
Minimal level of articulation and expression, with some sentence or paragraph structure unclear, and/or a considerable number of spelling or grammatical errors.
Moderate level of articulation and expression, with some sentence or paragraph structure unclear, and/or a number of spelling or grammatical errors.
Substantial level of articulation and expression, with clear and concise sentence and paragraph structure, and minimal spelling or grammatical errors.
Excellent level of articulation and expression, with clear and concise sentence and paragraph structure, and no spelling or grammatical errors.
REFERENCES APA Style and credibility
No references cited. Incorrect APA referencing style for in- text citations quotes and/or references.
Numerous errors noted in APA referencing of in- text citations, quotes or references. Some references are NOT reputable, current, extensive or relevant.
A couple of errors noted in APA referencing of in-text citations, quotes or references. A number of references are reputable, current, extensive and relevant
In-text citations and quotes and referencing are in APA style of a sound quality. Most references are reputable, current, extensive and relevant
All in-text citations, quotes and references are in APA style of a very high quality. All references are reputable, current, extensive and relevant.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."
