Posted on by Judy

Team Assignment Systems Thinking On A National Level Ii

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT:
Get together with your Learning Team and review the feedback from your instructor about the Week Three Systems Thinking on a National Level, Part 1 assignment. Discuss what changes or additions need to be made to the systems thinking diagram to better define and develop the components and relationships of the health care issue you selected.

INSTRUCTIONS:
Create a second draft of your systems thinking diagram that provides more details regarding the stock, inflows, outflows, and feedback loops and other system components you have read about in the textbook.
TEAM RESPONSIBLITIES:
Inflow: Elana (BLUE) COMPLETE BY 04.27.2019
Stocks: Jennifer (PURPLE) COMPLETE BY 04.25.2019
Outflow: Eddie (RED) COMPLETE BY 04.27.2019
Feedback Loops for Inflow: Nicolette (ORANGE) COMPLETE BY 04.29.2019
****Feedback Loops for Outflow: Ziomara (GREEN)  ****  COMPLET
DUE DATE FOR OVERALL INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION: SUNDAY, APRIL 29 @ 1900 EST FOR NECESSARY REVISIONS
DEFINITIONS:
INFLOW- Any aspect of the system that makes our MRSA problem worse (ineffective hand-washing, staff turn-over, policy noncompliance, abuse of antibiotics, over prescribing, abuse of antibacterial soap, etc.)

STOCKS – Key aspects such as employees, providers, the community, regulatory, evidence-based practice, etc.
OUTFLOW: Any aspect of the system that makes our MRSA problem better (effective training, evidence-based practice, etc.)
********This is where that research and familiarity to MRSA via SHEA or CDC will be beneficial to you***************
AS A TEAM, WE ARE DEPENDENT ON EACH OTHER TO COMPLETE THIS TASK SEAMLESSLY, PLEASE NOTE YOUR PERSONAL TIMELINE. 
YOU ALL CANNOT COMPLETE YOUR TASK WITHOUT MY REVIEWING STOCKS AND ADDING/SUBTRACTING – NICOLETTE & ZIOMARA CANNOT COMPLETE THEIR CONTRIBUTION EFFICIENTLY WITHOUT THE ELANA’S AND EDDIE’S CLOSURE ON THEIR ASSIGNMENT. EACH OF OUR SUCCESS IS DEPENDENT ON THE OTHER.
Please note the your color assignment. 
This is important to track team contribution. I have attached a copy of our Week 3 submission. Please look at this closely & DOWNLOAD IT. Any additional text boxes you will insert, arrows, changes in current colors to the draft, etc. must be in your designated color. 
Each of you will submit your own revision of our rough draft system map and once I have received everyone’s, I will combine all our contributions into one map & this will be color coordinated.
****PLEASE RENAME YOUR CONTRIBUTION TO INCLUDE YOUR NAME SO THAT I CAN OPEN MULTIPLE FILES WITHOUT GETTING LOST IN THE SIMILARITIES******
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"

Related posts:

  1. You need to develop a new dessert for you restaurant. You gather your chefs together for a team based creative session. Which of the following discussions methods would prove most useful for developing this new dessert offering? Sensational thinking Standard agenda Morphological analysis Group decision support systems
  2. Tom Lyons S Number Assignment Team 2 Subject Team Angie Leader Max Donna Thomas Assignment Q17761670
  3. Company XYZ is a mid-sized R&D organization that is largely based on team work. As a result, semi-annual performance evaluations are conducted at the team and not individual level. Team A received a mediocre rating on the most recent performance evaluation. The manager explained that his appraisal was objective and was solely based on the mediocre quality of the last two projects the team completed which was also evidenced by mediocre customers’ evaluations. Although the team accepted the rating as very objective, one team member expressed his strong disagreement. He said that his own contribution was error-free and he should not be punished for the mistakes of his team members. He demanded to change his performance rating from the mediocre to high. As a manager, what would you do in this situation? What would be your response to the employee? Justify your answer. [This is a reactive approach. You need to deal with the situation as it is.] Proactively, would you do to avoid such situations in the future? Explain. USE TEXTBOOK CASCIO-MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES 9TH EDITION, CITE WITH PAGE NUMBERS WEAR INFO WAS FOUND IF POSSIBLE.
  4. System Thinking 19231127