Option #2: Threats to HIT Training Plan Data accuracy and security are crucial to the administration of electronic medical records. Threats to the use of electronic medical records include physical loss or damage, crimes, viruses, and unauthorized access. Select one of the following topics as it relates to electronic medical records: Health Systems Security Health Systems Quality Health Systems Privacy. Then design a training plan that focuses on this topic and addresses the following: Identify various challenges that are present for small practices in implementing an electronic medical record. Are these different from those affecting a large healthcare system? Explain why you think so. Identify the key stakeholders—who could benefit from training on the threat you selected, particularly as it relates to EMR? Outline a training strategy that will build the skills needed to effectively support and utilize an EMR. Determine and explain key elements to be included in the training and frequency of training. Your training plan should meet the following requirements: Four to five pages in length, not including the title and reference pages. Support your plan and points with a minimum of three sources in addition to the course text. Remember, you must support your thinking/opinions and prior knowledge with references; all facts must be supported, and in-text citations used throughout the assignment must be included in an APA-formatted reference list. The CSU-Global library is a good place to find these references. Format your plan, citations, and references according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.). Review the grading rubric in the Module 4 folder for specific grading criteria and reach out to your instructor if you have questions about the assignment. Rubric Mod 4 CT Assignment Mod 4 CT Assignment Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements 10.0 to >8.0 pts Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 4.0 to >0 pts Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 10.0 to >8.0 pts Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 4.0 to >0 pts Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis 10.0 to >8.0 pts Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the challenges for small practices and the stakeholders who would benefit from training. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 4.0 to >0 pts Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem Solving 10.0 to >8.0 pts Demonstrates strong or adequate thought and insight in problem solving to, 1) create a training strategy that fits the needs of the stakeholders, and 2) plan out the key elements of the training plan. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Some significant but not major errors or omissions in problem solving. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Major errors or omissions in problem solving. 4.0 to >0 pts Fails to demonstrate problem solving. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources/Examples 10.0 to >8.0 pts Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Sources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 4.0 to >0 pts Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 4.0 to >0 pts Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors. 4.0 to >0 pts Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors. 10.0 pts Total Points: 70.0
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."
