Evaluate the pros and cons of the student’s proposed strategy. Points are deducted if the response:

Evaluate the pros and cons of the student’s proposed strategy. Points are deducted if the response:

Read Chapter 27 scenario, and address the following question, “What were some of the risk sources that emerged repeatedly in evaluating the risks? How is this helpful?”

Instructions for Initial Posts:

After reading the scenario, start a new discussion thread. Points are deducted if your submission:

Does not adhere to the University’s academic dishonesty and plagiarism policies.
Does not answer the question(s) thoroughly meaning with more than 3 paragraphs
Contains contractual phrases, as an example “shouldn’t” “couldn’t” or “didn’t,” or similar
Uses vague words such as “proper,” “appropriate,” “adequate,” or similar to describe a process, function, or a procedure.
As an example, “proper incident response plan,” “appropriate IT professional,” “adequate security,” or similar. These words are subjective because they have a different meaning to different individuals.
Instructions for Responses:

Respond to ONE peer posting. Evaluate the pros and cons of the student’s proposed strategy. Points are deducted if your response:

Does not adhere to the University’s academic dishonesty and plagiarism policies.
Does not address the pros and cons of the student’s proposed strategy.
Is not a substantive comment that extends the conversation. Meaning about a paragraph – not just “I agree” statements.
Contains contractual phrases, as an example “shouldn’t” “couldn’t” or “didn’t,” or similar
Uses vague words such as “proper,” “appropriate,” “adequate,” or similar to describe a process, function, or a procedure.
As an example, “proper incident response plan,” “appropriate IT professional,” “adequate security,” or similar. These words are subjective because they have a different meaning to different individuals.