Posted on by Judy

Explain the differences between a ” Manager Style and a “Leader Style with respect to: a) The effect on the organizations ability to maintain and motivate personnel and to make the goals they have chosen b) The effect on the personnel who report directly to the manager with relation their individual motivation to excel in their work and to remain at the corporation.

a) If the organization is run by Manager-style people, the schedules of every activity are fixed and unchangable irrespective of the external and emergency factors. Ths may get the company its output on time but the quality of output may not be upto the mark. Where as in a leader-style run company, there is more empathy towards employees and other factors. This helps the company get the best output from the available resources.
b) In a manager style company, employees usually dont look for motivation beyond their manager. This means, if the manager is bad, the employee’s motivation takes a hit. This can lead to high attrition and constant change in workforce. In a leader-style company, good leadership always trickles down the hierarchy and so there are more sources of motivation for the employee. This makes the employee happy and encourage him to achieve the goals set for him.
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"

Related posts:

  1. Think like an Administrator Every police supervisor can tell a story about an unmotivated patrol officer. Most of these accounts highlight the details of how the employee has performed poorly (does not show up for work, late for work, poor relations with other officers), and in some cases, the documentation boils down to the fact that the employee just does not want to work. Everyone has a theory on how best to handle this type of employee, but most police administrators will also tell you that addressing this type of employee is enormously difficult. Given what has been presented in the chapter regarding theories of motivation and what we know about how to motivate employees, how should an administrator address an unmotivated employee? In addition, does motivation filter itself out in different ways within police organizations? In other words, how a chief might motivate an employee and how a sergeant might motivate an employee in the same agency could be two different things. Correct? Do expectations and processes to deal with employees differ depending on the levels of the agency? How is this dictated by a labor agreement and possible union involvement? Yes, both the chief and the immediate supervisor have policies and procedures that spell out how employees are to be handled when they do not meet job expectations, yet is not the situation even more complicated than it might seem to appear? How do we know the lack of motivation in question is really a function of being a poorly motivated employee? These are important questions to 15- consider regarding employee motivation. Consider the questions below as well as we consider the complexity of the motivation process within criminal justice organizations. How does your decision as an administrator affect the departmental perception on how unmotivated officers are managed and handled? Is there a possible ripple effect of a decision on how to address an unmotivated employee that will have consequences for how other officers perceive the department and their own levels of motivation? How is the disciplinary process either a good or bad way to address an unmotivated employee? Does the disciplinary process work against employee motivation? If so how? 1. 2. 3. 4.
  2. Think like an Administrator Every police supervisor can tell a story about an unmotivated patrol officer. Most of these accounts highlight the details of how the employee has performed poorly (does not show up for work, late for work, poor relations with other officers), and in some cases, the documentation boils down to the fact that the employee just does not want to work. Everyone has a theory on how best to handle this type of employee, but most police administrators will also tell you that addressing this type of employee is enormously difficult. Given what has been presented in the chapter regarding theories of motivation and what we know about how to motivate employees, how should an administrator address an unmotivated employee? In addition, does motivation filter itself out in different ways within police organizations? In other words, how a chief might motivate an employee and how a sergeant might motivate an employee in the same agency could be two different things. Correct? Do expectations and processes to deal with employees differ depending on the levels of the agency? How is this dictated by a labor agreement and possible union involvement? Yes, both the chief and the immediate supervisor have policies and procedures that spell out how employees are to be handled when they do not meet job expectations, yet is not the situation even more complicated than it might seem to appear? How do we know the lack of motivation in question is really a function of being a poorly motivated employee? These are important questions to 15- consider regarding employee motivation. Consider the questions below as well as we consider the complexity of the motivation process within criminal justice organizations. How does your decision as an administrator affect the departmental perception on how unmotivated officers are managed and handled? Is there a possible ripple effect of a decision on how to address an unmotivated employee that will have consequences for how other officers perceive the department and their own levels of motivation? How is the disciplinary process either a good or bad way to address an unmotivated employee? Does the disciplinary process work against employee motivation? If so how? 1. 2. 3. 4.
  3. How does the motivation of a leader most notably affect his/her leadership style? Why? How does the motivation of a follower most commonly affect his/her ability to be led? Why?
  4. Company XYZ is a mid-sized R&D organization that is largely based on team work. As a result, semi-annual performance evaluations are conducted at the team and not individual level. Team A received a mediocre rating on the most recent performance evaluation. The manager explained that his appraisal was objective and was solely based on the mediocre quality of the last two projects the team completed which was also evidenced by mediocre customers’ evaluations. Although the team accepted the rating as very objective, one team member expressed his strong disagreement. He said that his own contribution was error-free and he should not be punished for the mistakes of his team members. He demanded to change his performance rating from the mediocre to high. As a manager, what would you do in this situation? What would be your response to the employee? Justify your answer. [This is a reactive approach. You need to deal with the situation as it is.] Proactively, would you do to avoid such situations in the future? Explain. USE TEXTBOOK CASCIO-MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES 9TH EDITION, CITE WITH PAGE NUMBERS WEAR INFO WAS FOUND IF POSSIBLE.