Posted on by Judy

GE’s Jack Welch paired younger employees with older and higher-ranking executives to transfer technology knowledge to higher organizational levels. This is an example of https://d2vlcm61l7u1fs.cloudfront.net/media%2F079%2F079c72c9-6271-4012-a176-9e487d0d499f%2FphpWJ3WGC.png

Option B: Reverse Mentoring
Reverse Mentoring: It is refers to an initiate where the older executives are paired with younger employees to transfer technology knowledge to higher organizational level.
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"

Related posts:

  1. Another way to assess the effectiveness of the selection system is to examine the decision-making accuracy Employee selection is basically a system to predict which applicants will succeed on the job. Highly qualified applicants are expected to perform well on the job. Similarly, scemingly less qualified applicants are not expected to perform well on the job. Unfortunately, the hiring process is complex. Some applicants can put on a “good show” and still be mediocre employees, whereas other applicants may interview poorly but still be excellent employees, Organizations cannot assume the selection process is working well without collecting and analyzing data. One option to calculate the decision-making accuracy of a selection system is to classify applicants into one of two categories: strong applicants (ones who appear to be highly qualified and are predicted to do the job well-a good hire) and weak applicants (ones who do not appear to be highly qualified and are predicted to not do the job well-a poor hire). Once hired and after sufficient time (typically six months to a year) has passed, employees can also be classified into two categories: good hire or poor hire. After all of this data is collected, the overall decision-making accuracy of the selection process (the total hit ratio) can be calculated as the percentage of correct predictions The table below shows data about the 200 tellers employed at the bank Strong applicant Weak applicant Poor hire 20 70 Good hire 80 30 Totals 100 100 1. Calculate the total hit ratio by adding the correct predictions and then dividing that number by the total number of decisions ma de. What is this percentage? Do you think this percentage is impressive 2. What percentage of weak applicants turned out to be good hires 3. What percentage of strong applicants turned out to be good hires? This percentage is known as the positive hit ratio. 4. Compare your answers to questions 2 and 3. Do you think the bank’s system is effective? https://media.cheggcdn.com/media%2F1a2%2F1a24e48a-ee1b-4831-839e-af5be1bc768f%2Fimage
  2. How do I get ES, EF, LS, LF, Slack and Duration. I don’t need answer give me formula formula. https://d2vlcm61l7u1fs.cloudfront.net/media%2F0c0%2F0c088753-654a-486c-b0cc-f3073f8bb1d7%2FphpddIGVR.png
  3. Questions Consideration is said to be either beneft to the promisor or detri- ment to the promisee. Who was the promisor, the uncle or the nephew? Who was the promisee? 2 Does Hamer v. Sidway find that the uncle had benefited from the nephew’s failure to drink, smoke, and so on? Did the nephew give up a legal right which, arguably, was not a benefit to the uncle? Is this situation what is meant by detriment to the promisee without there being benefit to the promisor? https://d2vlcm61l7u1fs.cloudfront.net/media%2F873%2F8730f55a-b61f-41cc-8ce4-14172661683e%2Fphp0yfKCx.png
  4. Borges Machine Shop, Inc., has a 1-year contract for the production of 250,000 gear housings for a new off-road vehicle. Owner Luis Borges hopes the contract will be extended and the volume increased next year. Borges has developed costs for three alternatives. They are general-purpose equipment (GPE), flexible manufacturing system (FMS), and expensive, but efficient, dedicated machine (DM). The cost data follow: Annual contracted units Annual fixed cost Per unit variable cost Equipment (GPE 250,000 $100,000 $15.00 System (FMS) 250,000 S250,000 $14.00 Dedicated Machine (DM) 250,000 $480,000 $13.00 The option GPE is best when the contracted volume is below 150000 units (enter your response as a whole number) The option FMS is best when the contracted volume is between andunits (enter your responses as whole numbers). https://d2vlcm61l7u1fs.cloudfront.net/media%2F694%2F694e8a7a-c347-4da5-b334-c2495e955bfd%2FphpC9kzPf.png