law Business Assignment

law business Assignment

BSL 212 – INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS LAW SPRING SEMESTER 2020

Analytical Paper: Ethics

After reading Chapter 2 of the textbook, watch the HBO documentary, The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley, directed by Alex Gibney. There will be a public screening of the film at 3:30PM on Tuesday, February, 18 in Storer Auditorium, followed by a panel discussion lead by Business School faculty. Plan ahead to ensure you have time to view the film at least once before beginning your paper.

Essay Prompt:

There are numerous examples of ethically ambiguous practices featured in the film. These practices may include actions, affirmative statements, omissions and/or schemes. Identify and explain one specific ethically ambiguous practice, including a brief description of the parties involved and how the practice worked. Then, utilizing the ethics material discussed in class and Chapter 2 of the textbook, analyze the ethics of the one specific practice you are focusing on . Your analysis should:

1. (1) Include two of the “Theories of Ethics” (you must choose from Utilitarianism, Deontology, and Justice) and two of the “Ethics Traps” presented in Chapter 2.
2. (2) Define and explain the theories and traps you are utilizing.
3. (3) Apply the theories and traps to analyze the ethics of the one specific practice you are focusing on.
4. (4) Use specific conversations and evidence from the film to assist in your analysis.

Your paper must be written in essay format; in other words, it should not be divided into individual answers to the above questions. Your paper must include an introduction and a conclusion, and the bulk of your paper should focus on analysis, not recitation of facts. There is no need to consult sources beyond your textbook, your class notes, and the film itself (outside research is, in fact, discouraged). Your paper must be a minimum of 1000 and a maximum of 1200 words, and must be double-spaced, utilizing Times Roman 12-point font and 1 inch margins. In the upper left-hand corner of the first page of your paper, list your name, your instructor’s name, the course (BSL 212), the date, and the exact word count of your paper. Direct quotes from the film or the textbook must be placed in quotation marks and the source should be noted in parentheses directly after the quote (The Inventor for the film, and Mann, Roberts, followed by the page number, for the textbook). Failure to comply with these specific instructions will negatively impact your grade, as reflected in the Analytical Paper Grading Rubric posted on Blackboard. You are to turn in a hard copy of your Analytical Paper, no later than the start of class on March 4, 2020. Your Analytical Paper must also be submitted in Word format on Blackboard under the designated “Assignments” tab by the same date and time as the hard copy. Please note that the papers will be run through Safe Assignment, which will compare them against the entire Internet and our internal database to help detect plagiarism. There is no makeup for this Analytical Paper; it is not subject to the quiz make up policy articulated in the course syllabus .

BSL 212 Analytical Paper Grading Rubric

90 – 100

Complies with Analytical Paper Instructions; Contains no or minor grammatical or spelling errors.

Identifies and explains an ethically ambiguous business practice/action; Correctly explains two ethical theories and two ethical traps; Provides in-depth sophisticated analysis of the practice/action utilizing the ethical theories and ethical traps. Analysis is bolstered by the use of all relevant facts as well as apt analogies.

80-89

Complies with Analytical Paper Instructions; Contains minor grammatical or spelling errors.

Identifies and explains an ethically ambiguous business practice/action; Correctly explains two ethical theories and two ethical traps; Accurately but mechanically analyzes the practice/action utilizing the ethical theories and traps. Analysis lacks depth and breadth of the “exceptional” response in terms of application of the ethical theories and traps or the use of relevant facts.