1. Uncle is the promiser and the nephew is the promisee.
2. Yes, Hamer v. Sidway does find that uncle was benefitted legally from the failure of nephew to drink, smoke and so on.
3.In this situation the promisee left drinking liquor and smoking tobacco even occasionally upto the age of 21 which was his legal rights just for the shake of his uncle’s promise. This abstainement from the legal rights is termed as detriment of the promisee.
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."