Required ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 8, 9
Lesson
Link (Word doc): Source Evaluation Worksheet
Minimum of 5 scholarly sources
InstructionsUse the Source Evaluation Worksheet to submit an annotated bibliography of 5 sources that you intend to use in your paper. Prepare a citation, annotation, and evaluation for each source.
You may collect the worksheets together as one document or you may submit a separate worksheet for each source.
Click on the following link for an example of an annotation.
Link: Annotation Example
Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51, 541-554.
The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 100-150 words per source (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
GradingThis activity will be graded using the Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric.
Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts
You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts
CriteriaRatingsPts
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuantity of Sources _9627
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
5.0 to >4.25 pts
5 or more sources
_431
Edit ratingDelete rating
4.25 to >3.75 pts
4 sources
_2164
Edit ratingDelete rating
3.75 to >3.0 pts
3 sources
_3519
Edit ratingDelete rating
3.0 to >0.0 pts
2 sources
_2381
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
1 or no sources
_5384
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 5.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality /Reliability of Sources _5246
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
5.0 to >4.25 pts
All works are from scholarly sources.
_6497
Edit ratingDelete rating
4.25 to >3.75 pts
Most works are from scholarly sources; no more than 1 from a substantive source.
_7429
Edit ratingDelete rating
3.75 to >3.0 pts
Some works are from scholarly sources; no more than 2 from substantive sources.
_7047
Edit ratingDelete rating
3.0 to >0.0 pts
Sources substantive or lower in quality.
_5451
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Few or no sources reach even substantive level; popular sources cited.
_1551
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 5.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecency of Sources _7484
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
5.0 to >4.25 pts
All sources less than 5 years old; if older, historical significance explained
_4395
Edit ratingDelete rating
4.25 to >3.75 pts
1 source older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance
_3559
Edit ratingDelete rating
3.75 to >3.0 pts
2 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance
_1835
Edit ratingDelete rating
3.0 to >0.0 pts
3 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance
_2174
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
4 or more sources older than 5 years old w/no explanation of historical significance
_5092
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 5.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Fluency of Annotations _8926
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
25.0 to >21.25 pts
All annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; clearly conveying main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay.
_4373
Edit ratingDelete rating
21.25 to >18.75 pts
Most annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; give sense of main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay.
_184
Edit ratingDelete rating
18.75 to >12.0 pts
Annotations are well-written but do not describe scope of source material; do not give clear idea of how source will be used in essay.
_159
Edit ratingDelete rating
12.0 to >0.0 pts
Annotations do not describe scope of source material and/or do not give idea of how they will be used in essay.
_2015
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Annotations lack detail, give no idea of how they will be used in essay OR no annotations.
_243
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 25.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA and Documentation _7412
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
10.0 to >8.5 pts
Citations are formatted correctly.
_9913
Edit ratingDelete rating
8.5 to >7.5 pts
There are a few formatting errors.
_7283
Edit ratingDelete rating
7.5 to >6.0 pts
There are some formatting errors.
_3279
Edit ratingDelete rating
6.0 to >0.0 pts
There are many and/or frequent formatting errors.
_8949
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
There is little or no adherence to APA format in the document.
_7956
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 10.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion
view longer description
Range
threshold: 5 pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
5to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
Edit ratingDelete rating
0to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 5 pts
—
Total Points: 50.0 out of 50.0
I’ll write free-form comments when assessing students
Remove points from rubric
Don’t post Outcomes results to Learning Mastery Gradebook
Use this rubric for assignment grading
Hide score total for assessment results
CancelCreate Rubric
Description
Long Description
CancelUpdate Criterion
Additional Comments:
CancelUpdate Comments
Additional Comments:
Rating Score
Rating max scoreto > pts
Rating Title
Rating Description
CancelUpdate Rating
Rubric
Can’t change a rubric once you’ve started using it.
Find a Rubric
Title: Find Rubric
Title
You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
Title
CriteriaRatingsPts
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion
view longer description
Range
threshold: 5 pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
5to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
Edit ratingDelete rating
0to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 5 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion
view longer description
Range
threshold: 5 pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
5to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
Edit ratingDelete rating
0to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 5 pts
—
Total Points: 5 out of 5
I’ll write free-form comments when assessing students
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."
