Posted on by Judy

Suppose The Luka Lu Resorts Company Has Both Debt And Equity Trading In Markets

Suppose the Luka Lu resorts company has both debt and equity trading in markets. The firm’s current market value
of equity is $14,010,000 and the market value of its debt is $11,704,545. Assume the tax rate is 30%.
The firm has twelve thousand bonds outstanding which mature 1 year from now. Each bond has a face value of $1000 and an annual coupon. The coupon rate is 3%. A coupon payment has just been paid.
You may assume the risk-free rate of return is 2% and the expected return of the market portfolio is 6%. The firm has an equity beta of 1.534.
The company is currently facing an investment opportunity with risk equivalent to the company’s current operations. The project has an initial cash outflow of $1,000,000, and the project is expected to have perpetual cash inflows after the initial date such that the payback period of the project is 19 years.
Ignore depreciation, and assume that the current capital structure will remain constant. Compute the NPV of the project, and decide whether the company should proceed with this project.
Book1 – Microsoft ExcelXHomeInsertPage LayoutFormulasDataReviewView@ -XCutCalibriEn Copy- 11 – A AWrap TextPercentageE AutoSum -Paste$ – %CellFillFormat PainterBIUBLAEMerge…
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"

Related posts:

  1. 1.Being Human, Inc., recently issued new securities to finance a new TV show. The project cost $13.8 million, and the company paid $705,000 in flotation costs. In addition, the equity issued had a flotation cost of 6.8 percent of the amount raised, whereas the debt issued had a flotation cost of 2.8 percent of the amount raised. If the company issued new securities in the same proportion as its target capital structure, what is the company’s target debt-equity ratio?
  2. Estimate the value of equity, by discounting the cash flows to equity at the cost of equity.
  3. Case Study: Tracey works in the capital budgeting department of Sustainable Solutions (SS), which is a company that manufactures products and consults on issues that relate to the protection and preservation of the earth’s environment. Tracey’s primary responsibility is to estimate the company’s cost of capital, which is the “hurdle” rate that is used to make final capital budgeting decisions. During the 10 years that Tracey has worked at SS, she has been very pleased with the service the company has provided to other companies and environmentalists. Tracey is very compassionate about environmental issues, and she tried to get involved in movements and do everything she can to help clean up and protect the environment. Last week, Manual, a coworker who works in the capital budgeting department as a project analyst, told Tracey about a project he is currently analyzing. Although he doesn’t completely understand the technology, Manual told Tracey that he thought purchasing the project would allow the firm to significantly increase its presence in the “green” industry and that it would also propel SS into the leadership role in the quest to clean up and protect the environment. Tracy was ecstatic after talking with Manual. But her excitement was short-lived because another coworker, one who is part of the team that is evaluating the new project, indicated that the analyses that have been completed to-date suggest that the project might not be purchased because its internal rate of return appears to be below the firm’s required rate of return. It will be a few weeks until the capital budgeting analyses are complete. Because she believed that the environmental benefits of the project far outweighed its possible financial drawbacks, Tracey decided to think of ways she could help “sway” the final capital budgeting decision in favor of purchasing the project. As luck would have it, Tracey is close to completing a revised evaluation of the firm’s cost of capital. She knows that the results of her evaluation will be used to help decide whether the new project is acceptable. As she pored over her numbers, Tracey realized that if she used a different approach to determine the proportions of debt and equity that are used to compute the firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC), a higher weight would be given to debt, which has the lowest component cost of capital. It has been the policy of the company to compute the weights for the capital components using the market values of the firm’s debt and equity. However, Tracey discovered that debt, which has a substantially lower cost than equity, will have a higher weight if book values are used. If the WACC is computed using the higher weight given to debt, the required rate of return used to evaluate the new project probably will be low enough to ensure that the new project is accepted. Tracey doesn’t feel like she is “cheating” by making the change because she doesn’t think that market values should be used to determine the weights for the capital components; she believes that book values are more appropriate. Tracey is convinced she can justify the deviation from policy if her bosses question why she used book values to determine the weights. My question for this Case Study: Would it be okay for Tracey to change the way she computes SS’s WACC? What can be done differently by Tracey?
  4. -5- Evaluate Return on Equity for PepsiCo for the last three years using the DuPont analysis. (15% of the project grade). You can find these ratios in the Internet or calculate them. If you use published ratios you must indicate that and cite their source. a. Find ROE, Net profit margin (listed as net margin), asset turnover, financial leverage for the last three years (2017 to 2019) for PepsiCo. You also may use debt/equity ratio in your analysis. Present the ratios as the table(s) in your project. b. Find ROE, Net profit margin (listed as net margin), asset turnover, financial leverage for the last year (2019) for its major peer competitor Coca Cola. You also may use debt/equity ratio of peer competitor in your analysis. Present the ratios as the table(s) in your project. c. Has PepsiCo’s ROE changed over the last three years? What was the main factor that influenced this change? d. Compare the ratios of PepsiCo to the peer competitor (Coca Cola). If the management of the company would like to improve their return on equity, what should the management of the company do? Write about 1 page of analysis to answer the questions (c) and (d). -6- Develop a specific recommendation, with supporting rationale, as to whether PepsiCo’s s recent trends and results in financial performance is of sufficient financial strength, will PepsiCo be financially sustainable over the next two to three years, and which steps should be done to improve its financial stability? (about 1 page) (15% of the project grade).