Topic: Should hospital emergency departments be used to treat mental health patients?
InstructionsThis week, you will complete your argumentative essay. Following the direction offered by Jackson and Newberry (2016) in Chapter 12, write an argumentative essay on the issue you chose in Week 2. Be sure your essay contains the following:
An introduction containing a thesis that states the issue, your position on the issue, what the paper will cover, and in what order
At least 2 paragraphs that each contain a well-supported (and documented) claim or sub-argument that will provide strong support for your fallacy-free argument
At least 1 paragraph discussing a documented, reasonable counterclaim to your position that needs to be a legitimate claim that someone has actually made as a counter-position on your issue
At least 1 paragraph offering a reasonable, documented response to that counterclaim
A conclusion that summarizes the argument and conclusion
Note: As you do your research, it is permissible to change your sources. Also, because of the recency and relevance of these issues, no sources older than 5 years should be used other than as historical information. Critical thinkers do the research first and then side with the preponderance of evidence. You might want to follow that principle.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 750-1000 words – approx. 3-4 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page (5 sources)
GradingThis activity will be graded using the Argumentative Essay Grading Rubric.
Argumentative Essay Grading Rubric – 150 pts
You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
Argumentative Essay Grading Rubric – 150 pts
CriteriaRatingsPts
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntro Paragraph: Thesis Preview of Argument _4121
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
10.0 to >8.5 pts
Well-developed introductory paragraph with stated thesis, detailed description of issue, necessary background; and preview (roadmap) to essay.
_9906
Edit ratingDelete rating
8.5 to >7.5 pts
Thesis stated with some background and description of issue but somewhat vague or unclear, and incomplete or unclear preview.
_8760
Edit ratingDelete rating
7.5 to >6.0 pts
Thesis is largely unclear; contains extraneous material not relevant to topic with little or no preview.
_7103
Edit ratingDelete rating
6.0 to >0.0 pts
Thesis is completely unclear, not relevant, or missing entirely. No preview of argument is present. Largely opinion or irrelevant material.
_6270
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
No thesis statement; no argument stated.
_4269
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 10.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody Paragraphs _130
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
40.0 to >34.0 pts
Main points are well-developed, relevant and well-connected to thesis; preview developed as stated in introduction.
_9042
Edit ratingDelete rating
34.0 to >30.0 pts
Main points develop preview, but not all are explicitly linked to thesis.
_7578
Edit ratingDelete rating
30.0 to >24.0 pts
One or more points not developed or with minimal development.
_8663
Edit ratingDelete rating
24.0 to >0.0 pts
Ideas are poorly developed; lacks central theme or development of thesis.
_5599
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Ideas are disjointed; there is no central theme.
_8720
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 40.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOpposing View _4648
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
20.0 to >17.0 pts
Refutation fairly recognizes strongest points of opposing view; refutation is relevant and responsive.
_52
Edit ratingDelete rating
17.0 to >15.0 pts
Acknowledges opposing view but does not address with relevant and responsive refutation.
_4691
Edit ratingDelete rating
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Vague refutation of opposing view.
_5879
Edit ratingDelete rating
12.0 to >0.0 pts
No refutation of opposing view.
_1083
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
No opposing view mentioned.
_9670
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 20.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConcluding Paragraph _1714
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
10.0 to >8.5 pts
Conclusion effectively sums up and restates argument without repetition.
_9047
Edit ratingDelete rating
8.5 to >7.5 pts
Conclusion merely restates thesis but does not sum up argument.
_6774
Edit ratingDelete rating
7.5 to >6.0 pts
Conclusion does not effectively capture thesis and/or argument.
_3817
Edit ratingDelete rating
6.0 to >0.0 pts
Conclusion merely repeats intro.
_5520
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
No conclusion.
_3956
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 10.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization _875
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
20.0 to >17.0 pts
Focused and well-organized. Logical and convincing progression of ideas. Clear premises leading to clear conclusions. Smooth transitions. No “filler” or extraneous material.
_9214
Edit ratingDelete rating
17.0 to >15.0 pts
Organized and focused. Logical presentation of ideas developed as arguments, but some parts conclusory without adequate support/premises. Some awkward transitions. Little to no extraneous material is included.
_3042
Edit ratingDelete rating
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Somewhat disorganized or lacking in focus; progression of ideas difficult to follow. Awkward or no transitions. Extraneous material.
_7004
Edit ratingDelete rating
12.0 to >0.0 pts
High degree of disorganization. No transitions. Lacks focus. Does not employ argumentative forms.
_3060
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Disorganized; no focus.
_1597
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 20.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Sources _2162
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
20.0 to >17.0 pts
References are scholarly; all points well-supported by credible and authoritative sources, used accurately, appropriately, offering solid support to points, without excessive quotation. Presented concisely in paraphrase or summation with no long quotes.
_4034
Edit ratingDelete rating
17.0 to >15.0 pts
Most references are scholarly. May have some incorrect citations, long quotations as opposed to summations; may have few or weak connections to sources; some support maybe weak or not well-integrated.
_9869
Edit ratingDelete rating
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Sources are few or are not scholarly; source may lack credibility, be dated. Sources do not actually offer support for points for which they are cited; weak support; support not well-integrated.
_2514
Edit ratingDelete rating
12.0 to >0.0 pts
Sources are not scholarly. Points are unsupported by credible, reliable and authoritative evidence.
_197
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
No sources cited.
_80
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 20.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting of Sources _112
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
10.0 to >8.5 pts
All references/in-text citations are properly formatted per APA style.
_2203
Edit ratingDelete rating
8.5 to >7.5 pts
Most references/in-text citations are properly formatted per APA style.
_8304
Edit ratingDelete rating
7.5 to >6.0 pts
Some references/in-text citations are properly formatted per APA style, but there are several errors.
_8131
Edit ratingDelete rating
6.0 to >0.0 pts
Several major errors in formatting of references/in-text citations that indicate a lack of understanding of APA format.
_8253
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
No sources cited/formatted.
_2880
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 10.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics _4849
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
20.0 to >17.0 pts
The writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the paper.
_6870
Edit ratingDelete rating
17.0 to >15.0 pts
The writing contains a few major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.
_6757
Edit ratingDelete rating
15.0 to >12.0 pts
The writing contains some major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the paper.
_732
Edit ratingDelete rating
12.0 to >0.0 pts
The writing contains several major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that impede a clear reading of the paper.
_7553
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
No effort
_4904
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 20.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion
view longer description
Range
threshold: 5 pts
Edit ratingDelete rating
5to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
Edit ratingDelete rating
0to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 5 pts
—
Total Points: 150.0
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."
