Posted on by Judy

Why might you want to look at a path other than the courts? In negotiation and mediation a middle ground is attempted to be found. Arbitration is more like private court with both parties pleading the case before a neutral third party. Please explain which form you would want to use in each dispute listed below and why. 1. Contract dispute between 2 parties. 2. Insurance claim between one person and their insurance company. 3. Insurance claim between you and someone else’s insurance company. 4. A claim between you and a company over liability for injuries sustained in their store.

Answer:
We might want to look at a path other than court, to have speedy resolution of the problem by direct negotiation and mediation with the involved parties.
Contract dispute between 2 parties :- In this case, we would like to prefer having negotiation and mediation to resolve the contract disputes as per the contract agreement between two parties. Thus it will provide speedy resolution and no additional formalities of the court and time engaging as per court process.
Insurance claim between one person and their insurance company : In this case, we would like to use court option, as in the insurance claim settlement, the insurance company will not want to listen the claim’s point and insurance company would like to make the best possible favor decision for the insurance company. Thus in order to seek right decision, one need to approach court. The court will be able to provide right decision for this case by listening the person’s opinion and company’s opinion.
Insurance claim between you and someone else’s insurance company: In this case the best option is negotiation and mediation, as this will facilitate the right decision for the issues. Since the insurance is some else’s company, so he will be able to provide right decision for the insurance company.
A claim between you and a company over liability for injuries sustained in their store: In this case the court will be the right option. The court will be able to provide the right decision based on the inputs to the case. This is the large case and it needs the decision as per the legal rule for liabilities on injuries. The normal person does not have the required knowledge and understanding of such legal rule and clauses for injury liabilities. Thus court will be able to make right justice for such cases.
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"

Related posts:

  1. Explain how in the concept of quasi-contract that the requirement for consideration can be seen as being met.
  2. Question: On what theory did the franchisees sue Carvel? Question: What must a plaintiff prove to win on this theory? Question: What does economic advantage mean? Question: How does this tort differ from tortious interference with contract? Question: What are the elements of tortious interference with contract? Question: In the Carvel case, what was the basis for the plaintiffs claim of economic advantage? What did Carvel do to upset the plaintiffs? Question: Did the court agree that this conduct amounted to tortious interference with prospective advantage? Why or why not?
  3. 39. A federal district court has the power to decide a contract dispute lawsuit if A. the amount in dispute exceeds $75,000. B. the plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states. C. the plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states, and the amount in dispute exceeds $75,000. D. the plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states, and the amount in dispute exceeds $50,000. 40. Which of the following is a method of alternative dispute resolution? A. Mediation B. Negotiated settlement C. Arbitration D. Mediation, Negotiated settlement, and Arbitration 41. Methods by which parties can gather evidence to prove their cases at trial include A. requests for admission B. hearsay C. requests for admission and interrogatories. D. interrogatories 42. Requests for production of documents can be directed to A. the judge in the case. B. witnesses who are not parties to the lawsuit. C. a plaintiff by a defendant, or a defendant by a plaintiff. D. none of the listed persons. 43. In the voir dire (jury selection) process, a prospective juror may not be challenged, due to A. the prospective juror’s bias B. the prospective juror’s race C. the prospective juror’s gender D. the prospective juror’s race or gender.
  4. Cowboy, Inc., an American corporation that produces cowboy hats contract with a manufacturing plant in France, Beret, Inc.  The contract provides that Beret, Inc. will produce the cowboy hats in France to be distributed back in the United States by Cowboy, Inc.  The contract does not provide which country’s law will apply if a dispute arises between Cowboy and Beret.  Eventually, Cowboy discovers that Beret is not producing the hats under the specifications agreed upon in the contract.  Which will American or French law be used in settling the dispute?  Why?