Posted on by Judy

Hi read this three article and answer the point below each article 3x300words total 900 words 1)https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wdrj67CPoX3ez7OBp5tzqURI2zF_S-hE 2)https://drive.google.com/open?id=1J5QatLVD8cFWJcQOEaD81gmO5K4KReq2 3)https://drive.google.com/open?id=1iB4yGCrJi8a0Om3dtx3k88iqOkaccBoU each article must include a)Summary Find the main idea of the article: Pros and Cons of online focus group b) Evaluation •Evaluates the credibility, limitations of the article, objectivity &/or bias. • c) Reflection •Summarises how the article help you with the understanding of the research topic

The three articles are ‘technology method intersect in the online focus group’, ‘online Facebook focus group research of hard to reach participants ‘ and ‘ influence of setting on findings produced in qualitative health research a comparison between face to face and online discussion groups about HIV/AIDS. The article provides information related to online focus groups and its benefits for getting responses from my iPad location synchronously through chat rooms or discussion software. The benefits have been listed effectively along with disadvantages.
There is increasing diversity related to research methods. It shows thew future which focuses on online focus groups. Hard Facebook focus group research of hard to reach participants focused on conducting qualitative research related to life experiences that are hard to reach individuals. The study explores the benefits of online social media platform for collection of data. It looks at social media platform as emerging mode for collection of qualitative data for the purpose of hard to reach participants. The third adticke ficuses on influence of settings produced in qualitative research and it presents comparison between Face to face and online discussion groups. The articles present a clear understanding about the changing mode of research methods and how it is useful for collection and interpretation of data. The articles are useful to point out the changing trend.
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"

Related posts:

  1. Questions for Doctor.melody Please help me with this assignment. Please ensure there are at least 4 sentences in a paragraph and always cite the resources. I have included some References that you could possibly use. 1). What are the most effective strategies for managing quality control on qualitative methods in program evaluation? 1a. Why are they the most effective? 2). What is benchmarking, and how does this term relate to the above question? 3). Explain why qualitative methods would prove advantageous over quantitative methods in program evaluation. 3a. What are the biggest drawbacks to using qualitative methods? 3b. Why? 4). Time is a huge hindrance associated with qualitative methods. How might you justify the amount of time that it takes to utilize qualitative methods here? References Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 5-34. Hendricks, M. (1981). Service delivery assessment: Qualitative evaluations at the cabinet level. In N. Smith (Ed.), New directions for program evaluation (No. 12, pp. 5-24).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (1985). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Royse, D., Thyer, B. A., &; Padgett, D. K. (2016). Program evaluation: An introduction (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. ISBN-13:9781305101968 Shaw, I. (2003). Qualitative research and outcomes in health, social work and education. Qualitative Research, 3(1), 57-77. Weathington, B. L., Cunningham, C. J. L., & Pittenger, D. J. (2010). Research methods for the behavioral and social sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. Weber, R. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Thank you!
  2. Social Work Process Evaluation
  3. Google has decided to return to the China market. Read “Why Google Quit China and Why It’s Heading Back” retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/01/why-google-quit-china-and-why-its-heading-back/424482/ Question-With Google’s reentry, how do Google’s actions coincide with their dropping of the motto, “Don’t be Evil”?
  4. Google has decided to return to the China market. Read “Why Google Quit China and Why It’s Heading Back” retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/01/why-google-quit-china-and-why-its-heading-back/424482/ *Look at Google’s initial decision to enter the Chinese market. Was it the right decision? Why? *How did Google’s mission compel it to create Google.cn? *What other reasons, i.e. financial, could there have been for entering China and, likewise, for leaving? *With Google’s reentry, how do Google’s actions coincide with their dropping of the motto, “Don’t be Evil”? *Select a company that demonstrates the ability to balance innovation with ethical decision making. In a couple of sentences describe why you selected this company and share the link.