Posted on by Judy

Assume you are assisting in conducting a JA as an HR department representative. You have encountered several managers who want to delete certain tasks and KSAOs from the formal job description that have to do with employee safety, even though they clearly are a job requirement. How should you handle this situation?

https://d2vlcm61l7u1fs.cloudfront.net/media%2F2bd%2F2bd71474-8417-4d3b-83a4-56685597f1a4%2Fphpv3OSez.png
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"

Related posts:

  1. The police department
  2. Imagine that you are hired to manage an underperforming department of a business. Upon assessing day to day operations for a period of time, you observe that there appears to be a good deal of confusion in the department. The problems run the gamut from unmotivated employees to those who either don’t know what they should be doing or don’t know how to do their job. Suggest a plan of correction to improve the department’s outcomes. In your response to your classmates, compare and contrast your plan with theirs. How can either be improved?
  3. discuss the possibility of setting up a computer system to handle some of the school’s administrative and financial tasks.
  4. Think like an Administrator Every police supervisor can tell a story about an unmotivated patrol officer. Most of these accounts highlight the details of how the employee has performed poorly (does not show up for work, late for work, poor relations with other officers), and in some cases, the documentation boils down to the fact that the employee just does not want to work. Everyone has a theory on how best to handle this type of employee, but most police administrators will also tell you that addressing this type of employee is enormously difficult. Given what has been presented in the chapter regarding theories of motivation and what we know about how to motivate employees, how should an administrator address an unmotivated employee? In addition, does motivation filter itself out in different ways within police organizations? In other words, how a chief might motivate an employee and how a sergeant might motivate an employee in the same agency could be two different things. Correct? Do expectations and processes to deal with employees differ depending on the levels of the agency? How is this dictated by a labor agreement and possible union involvement? Yes, both the chief and the immediate supervisor have policies and procedures that spell out how employees are to be handled when they do not meet job expectations, yet is not the situation even more complicated than it might seem to appear? How do we know the lack of motivation in question is really a function of being a poorly motivated employee? These are important questions to 15- consider regarding employee motivation. Consider the questions below as well as we consider the complexity of the motivation process within criminal justice organizations. How does your decision as an administrator affect the departmental perception on how unmotivated officers are managed and handled? Is there a possible ripple effect of a decision on how to address an unmotivated employee that will have consequences for how other officers perceive the department and their own levels of motivation? How is the disciplinary process either a good or bad way to address an unmotivated employee? Does the disciplinary process work against employee motivation? If so how? 1. 2. 3. 4.