Posted on by Judy

termine whether your assumptions are true consequences Ul Team Skill Builder 15-3: Dealing with People Who Make Your Life Difficult The Backstabber” successes He’ll double-cross teammates for personal gain and make excuses for any missed work. We work in an organiza- tion where the rewards aren’t great, but Brutus is still there, tre This is the fourth in a series of exercises that introduces you to people who might make your life and job difficult. 1. Have students read the following statement from Rex Dun- can, an employee at Alvey Electric, a medium-sized parts ng to figure out a way to “work the system. Using the Internet, find at least three sources for coping with a backstabber in the workplace. Carefully review each site for suggestions for dealing with this type of behavior. Based on your findings, what suggestions would you give to Rex Duncan 2. manufacturing firm in Tennessee: Working with Brutus sure is frustrating. He has the uncanny ability to pull off any work assignment given to him. Not long s on my project team to develop a new electri cal harness system for a classic car. Paul had been given the assignment of researching other successful efforts so that we didn’t spend all our time reinventing the wheel. At the meet- ing when Paul presented his findings, Brutus waited until just the right moment before jumping in with his own research ago, Brutus wa for coping with Brutus? 3 Group students into small groups of at least four One of the students will play the role of Rex Dun- and RLEPAT can, another will be his immediate anding Several of the things Brutus found flew in the face of the others are coworkers who have similar observations about Brutus. (a) The student playing the role of Duncan should share his or her observations about B those playing the roles of coworkers should add comments to the conversation. (b) If the supervisor gated and found all the allegations to be true, what should the supervisor do? Paul’s research and made Paul appear incompetent. rutus, and I don’t trust Brutus. He is very controlling, greedy, and driven by his hunger for power. He is always behind the scenes, maneuvering and manipulating to get what he wants. Brutus knows just what to do to get the work done and always has his own agenda. He never volunteers suggestions or ideas to investi- the groups planning meetings. If the meeting includes people 4. Discipline should be direc ted against the act and not from corporate, Brutus is really great at sabotaging the group?s plan. He always seems to have a plan or two in his hip pocket against the person. Does the group believe that disciplinary action is warranted? Why? Why not? to spring on the group. His surprises mean you always have to 5. Why might disciplinary or corrective action be difficult for be on your guard. the supervisor? I’ve learned not to turn my back on Brutus. He is always spreading rumors and will try his best to ruin your career to promote his. You’re always on your guard with him. His team spirit is minimal, but he steps forward to take credit for any Collaboratively, write a one-page paper explaining how this Team Skill-Builder increased your knowledge of the difficul ties of changing undesirable behaviors via positive discipline. 6.

In all the three sites consulted to find out more feasible ways to counter people like Brutus, these facts were common, like;
Never reveal hisself to people like him:
As Duncan has already encountered that people lie Brutus can come down to any level to bring his reputation down so it is better not to involve oneself in a relation or lead to any situation where his words can be used against Duncan. He might have his reservations against the management or the project that Duncan is working on or any other colleague he does not go well with, so these reservations and reviews should be contained and not to be revealed to people like Brutus.
Be always cautious around them:
Duncan might have some skills and qualifications which might eventually lead him to a bigger platform in his current office or even certain facts that may create some issues with Duncan. So, one has to be cautious that these information are not shared with Brutus both positive and negative as he can use any of them against Duncan in his favour.
Do not be lured:
It might happen that Brutus, just out of the blue changes to be someone who is more collaborative towards, appreciates his work and also let other colleagues know about his accomplishments and he does similar positive things for a long time now, now people around him might be thinking he might have learned a lesson and is trying to redeem himself but no, it just might be one his grand plans where he wants his colleagues and especially Duncan to buy so that he can have access to something very pivotal that will bring him something he has long desired for, again backstabbing everyone for his personal gain.
4.
Yes, rather than categorising an individual as evil for his/her past deeds it is always a more practical to identify the tasks that should be disciplined, this way an individual will not always be looked upon suspiciously even if he is trying to improve. If monitoring specific tasks committed by single or multiple individuals can be brought to notice then it will surely act as a deterrent for those who might try to act smart.
5.
A supervisor monitors and control his or her subordinates and mostly people in his capacity try to lead by an example, now if a supervisor does something that should be disciplined then the moral of the subordinates goes down along with the supervisor’s. This may lead to performance deficit in the company and it is also possible that people who have kept quiet for too long may come forward to speak against, all these might lead to the fact the supervisor might have to lose the job or even if he is not fired he will try and find ways to come after that individual who reported that issue to the management so the repercussions can go both ways.
6.
THIS IS A SUBJECTIVE QUESTION THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED WITHOUT DESCRIPTIVE CONTEXT SO PLEASE DO TAKE NOTES FROM THE ANSWERS AND COMPLETE THE QUESTION WITH YOUR TEAM OR FROM YOUR LEARNING OF THE UNIT.
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but splendidwritings.com proved they are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 14***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"The company has some nice prices and good content. I ordered a term paper here and got a very good one. I'll keep ordering from this website."

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"

Related posts:

  1. Case Study: A Good Team Player Topic: Leadership Involved Parties: Steven, Assistant Department Manager Kristin, Newly appointed supervisor of Steven’s work team Having done well as a staff accountant in the accounts payable section of a major industrial firm for several years since his graduation from college, Steven felt that he had learned much about the “ins” and “outs” of survival in an intensely bureaucratic organization. It is thus not surprising that he was relaxed and unconcerned about his circumstances at the company as he entered the employee lounge to attend the late-afternoon welcoming reception for his new supervisor. The new manager of accounts payable, Kristin, had been transferred to Steven’s division from a similar position in another subsidiary of the company because of her proven talent for organizing and improving the efficiency of operations there. A no-nonsense type of manager, Kristin was experienced and determined to perform her new assignment with the same vigor that had brought her so much success throughout her career. At the reception, Kristin circulated through the room, introducing herself to her new subordinates and asking each of them if they had any suggestions that would help make the payables section a better place to work. When she approached Steven, he told her about something that had been on his mind lately: that people seemed to him to gain promotions and be given opportunities to work overtime based on who liked them and not on the quality of their work. In reply, Kristin politely stated that she would do everything that she could to see that whatever it was he was referring to would have no place in the team she would lead. Upon his arrival at work the next day, Steven received a phone call from Kristin’s secretary asking that he meet with his new boss later that morning. He had barely entered her office for the meeting when she looked him straight in the eye and said, “I will not tolerate individuals in this organization who are not good team players. Yesterday afternoon you led me to believe that there are people in this office who are not acting in the best interests of the company, and I want to know who. I want you to tell me the names of the managers you were referring to note, and keep me informed if you see anyone hurting this company, or I’ve got to think that maybe you’re part of the problems around here.” Stunned by both the tone and content of her statement, Steven quickly tried to think of a way to respond. How should Steven respond?
  2. Case Study: A Good Team Player Topic: Leadership Involved Parties: Steven, Assistant Department Manager Kristin, Newly appointed supervisor of Steven’s work team Having done well as a staff accountant in the accounts payable section of a major industrial firm for several years since his graduation from college, Steven felt that he had learned much about the “ins” and “outs” of survival in an intensely bureaucratic organization. It is thus not surprising that he was relaxed and unconcerned about his circumstances at the company as he entered the employee lounge to attend the late-afternoon welcoming reception for his new supervisor. The new manager of accounts payable, Kristin, had been transferred to Steven’s division from a similar position in another subsidiary of the company because of her proven talent for organizing and improving the efficiency of operations there. A no-nonsense type of manager, Kristin was experienced and determined to perform her new assignment with the same vigor that had brought her so much success throughout her career. At the reception, Kristin circulated through the room, introducing herself to her new subordinates and asking each of them if they had any suggestions that would help make the payables section a better place to work. When she approached Steven, he told her about something that had been on his mind lately: that people seemed to him to gain promotions and be given opportunities to work overtime based on who liked them and not on the quality of their work. In reply, Kristin politely stated that she would do everything that she could to see that whatever it was he was referring to would have no place in the team she would lead. Upon his arrival at work the next day, Steven received a phone call from Kristin’s secretary asking that he meet with his new boss later that morning. He had barely entered her office for the meeting when she looked him straight in the eye and said, “I will not tolerate individuals in this organization who are not good team players. Yesterday afternoon you led me to believe that there are people in this office who are not acting in the best interests of the company, and I want to know who. I want you to tell me the names of the managers you were referring to note, and keep me informed if you see anyone hurting this company, or I’ve got to think that maybe you’re part of the problems around here.” Stunned by both the tone and content of her statement, Steven quickly tried to think of a way to respond. How should Steven respond?
  3. Sales Team Action Plan
  4. Scenario You are the HR Director for a large university. The college of business has recently been profiled in the local media for having the least diverse staff of any organization at the university. The college will need to hire a new office assistant, but they are concerned that their position description may have neutral requirements that in the past resulted in fewer applications from people of color. The knowledge, skills and abilities contained in the job description are as follows: Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Three (3) to five (5) years’ experience in an office setting in a high-level clerical role. This incumbent in this position must have a high level of knowledge in university, division, and office policy and procedure to respond independently to people and situations with consistency and accuracy. Thorough knowledge of office procedures and techniques, with previous executive level office experience to effectively ascertain and predict the needs of the Dean and office are critical. Demonstrated team player, as exemplified by memberships in church or social groups. Outstanding organizational skills, problem solving, planning, scheduling, work accuracy, attention to detail, oral and written communication, human relations skills and the ability to work with a diverse population of faculty, staff and students are required. Ability to perform the essential job functions at a very high level with little or no training. You are asked by the President of the university to review these job requirements to determine if any of the neutral requirements could be resulting in adverse impact. He requests a memo from you with your findings. Your Assignment Write a memo to the university President with your findings of which of the neutral job requirements could result in adverse impact. Explain why, and also explain what new requirements you would recommend to assess a candidate’s qualifications.